Netizen Narratives of Hate: A Pragmatic Analysis of Insulting Comments in Putri Padang’s TikTok

Main Article Content

Nafisah Nuha Mufidah
Nila Kencana
Elva Utami

Abstract

This study examines the pragmatic features of insults in the comment sections of TikTok videos posted by Putri Padang, a popular Indonesian content creator. Using a qualitative approach, the research analyzes the types of insults, the pragmatic strategies used by netizens, and the social functions of these insults. Drawing on speech act theory, politeness theory, and impoliteness theory, the study categorizes insults as direct or indirect and identifies strategies such as sarcasm, hyperbole, and face-threatening acts (FTAs). The findings reveal that insults on TikTok serve not only as expressions of hostility but also as tools for social bonding and status assertion within the comment section. TikTok's platform features, such as viral content promotion and easy commenting, contribute to the heightened prevalence of aggressive language. The study concludes that digital platforms like TikTok create unique environments where insults function as complex social acts, involving both individual expression and group dynamics. This research highlights the importance of understanding online communication in shaping public discourse and suggests avenues for future studies on digital aggression across various platforms.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Nafisah Nuha Mufidah, Nila Kencana, & Elva Utami. (2025). Netizen Narratives of Hate: A Pragmatic Analysis of Insulting Comments in Putri Padang’s TikTok. Proceedings of the Conference on the Future of English Language Education, 1, 60-68. https://proceedings.dokicti.org/index.php/cfele/article/view/346

References

Alamsyah, A., & Sagama, Y. (2024). Empowering Indonesian internet users: An approach to counter online toxicity and enhance digital well-being. Intelligent Systems with Applications, 22, 200394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswa.2024.200394

Bączkowska, A. (2021). “You're too thick to change the station ” – Impoliteness, insults, and responses to insults on Twitter. Topics in Linguistics, 22(2), 62–84. https://doi.org/http//10.2478/topling-2021-0011

Baider, F. (2020). Pragmatics lost? Overview, synthesis and proposition in defining online hate speech. Pragmatics and Society, 11(2), 196-217.

Filibeli, T. E., & Ertuna, C. A. N. (2021). Sarcasm beyond hate speech : Facebook comments on Syrian refugees in Turkey. International Journal of Communication, 15(1), 2236–2259. https://doi.org/http//Doi.1932–8036/20210005

Green, D. (2024). The legal categorisation of cyber hate: A corpus-assisted exploration of prompting, inciting, insulting and making contemptuous in hate speech discourse. In Handbook on Cyber Hate. Law and Visual Jurisprudence (p. 13). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51248-3_12

Hardiyanto, L., Iriansyah, H. S., & Pudjiastuti, S. R. (2024). Cyberbullying on social media and its implications for the mental health of generation Z in the context of the second principle. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan (JIP) STKIP Kusuma Negara, 15(2), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.37640/jip.v15i2.1828

Jafarnia, A., Hariri, H., & Parvizi, G.-R. (2023). Unlocking the potential: Exploring the multifaceted impact of artificial intelligence integration in language learning. LET Journal 2023, 3(2), 173–185. http://langedutech.com

Li, T., & Xu, F. (2018). Re-appraising self and other in the English translation of contemporary Chinese political discourse. Discourse, Context and Media, 25, 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.04.003

MasterClass. (2021). Pragmatics in linguistics: Definition and examples. Masterclass.Com, September. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29145.85606

McCambridge, L. (2022). Describing the voice of online bullying: An analysis of stance and voice type in YouTube comments. Discourse, Context & Media, 45, 100552. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100552

Napitupulu, M. H., & Situmorang, S. (2022). The influence of digital influencers on linguistic evolution in the Javanese language. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Humaniora, 11(1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.35335/jiph.v11i1.13

Rabbani, K., Mehmood, M. A., & Areej, A. (2024). Speech act of flaming: A pragmatic analysis of Twitter trolling in Pakistan. Discourse & Society, 35(4), 499–517. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265231222589

Rahmah, F. A., & Khasanah, I. (2023). Kreativitas generasi Z menggunakan bahasa prokem dalam berkomunikasi pada aplikasi TikTok. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 6(3), 827–840. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v6i3.675

Retta, M. (2023). A pragmatic and discourse analysis of hate words on social media. Internet Pragmatics, 6(2), 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00096.ret

Samsudin, S., Mujab, S., Safar, M., & Munandar, H. (2023). The effect of digitalization on language and culture in management practice modern education. Lingua, 19(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.34005/lingua.v19i2.3131

Siagian, B. A., & Sitorus, N. (2023). The dynamics of neighborhood speaking: a sociopragmatic study. Premise: Journal of English Education, 12(1), 128. https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v12i1.5486

Siregar, F. S., & Suprayetno, E. (2024). Illocutionary acts of hate speech : Analyzing social media commentary targeting Anies Baswedan. Indonesian EFL Journal (IEFLJ), 10(1), 97–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v10i1.9338

Slamet, J. (2024). Potential of ChatGPT as a digital language learning assistant: EFL teachers’ and students’ perceptions. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00143-2

Stanca, L., & Cristina, F. (2014). Measuring the efficiency of a Web 2.0 tool designed for teaching and learning English for academic purposes in tertiary education. Procedia Economics and Finance, 15(40), 654–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(14)00536-x

Tareen, M. K., Tareen, H. K., Noreen, S., & Tariq, M. (2021). Hate speech and social media: A systematic review. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 12(8), 5285 – 5294.

Tasyarasita, A. Z., Duhita, M. E., Yulianti, W., & Yustanto, H. (2023). Ragam bahasa slang oleh remaja Gen Z pada media sosial TikTok (kajian sosiolinguistik). Translation and Linguistics (Transling), 3(2), 98-109.

Umar, F. A. (2021). Examining the dignity of Indonesian language in the era of Industry 4.0. European Journal of Humanities and Educational Advancements, 2(12), 68–77. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/391373-examining-the-dignity-of-indonesian-lang-3c557573.pdf

Vásquez, C. (2021). “I appreciate u not being a total prick …”: Oppositional stancetaking, impoliteness, and relational work in adversarial Twitter interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 185, 40–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.08.009

Yunus, R. M. (2021). Increasing human literacy for generation Z through learning to use technology in Indonesia. International Journal of Science and Society, 3(4), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v3i4.512